Menu
Contribute to the Blog

The History of Navigation: Where Did It Come From?

November 11, 2010 | AONN+ Blog | Navigation
Featuring:
Lillie D. Shockney, RN, BS, MAS, HON-ONN-CG
Lillie D. Shockney, RN, BS, MAS, HON-ONN-CG
Editor-in-Chief, JONS; Co-Founder, AONN+; University Distinguished Service Professor of Breast Cancer, Professor of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Co-Developer, Work Stride-Managing Cancer at Work, Johns Hopkins Healthcare Solutions

In the late 1980s, changes were made to this method of monitoring care and utilization management (UM) was introduced. UM was the evaluation of the appropriateness, medical need, and efficiency of healthcare services, procedures, and facilities according to established criteria or guidelines and under the provisions of an applicable health benefits plan. The overarching goal, according to the government and managed care organizations, was to help ensure that patients were provided cost-effective, high quality, medically necessary care delivered in an efficient manner. Despite this goal, the relationships between managed care organizations (as well the PROs overseeing Medicare and Medicaid) and doctors and hospitals were still adversarial. UM strategies sought to avoid delays in treatment and in discharge from the hospital for inpatients, no matter what their disease or disorder. DRGs were still the payment system. Insurance companies invested large dollars performing, in a concurrent manner, medical record reviews while patients were hospitalized. UM nurses monitored each patient's hospitalization to ensure each day was medically necessary, there were no barriers to treatment or barriers to the patient being discharged to home or to a lower level of care, and the patient had a good clinical outcome. (Note that I used the navigation word barriers.)

Hospitals also employed UM nurses (many of whom were previously UR nurses) to review the medical record documentation daily during a patient's hospitalization. The UM nurses would contact the doctor if he or she identified any barriers to treatment or to discharge. The most common problem was lack of documentation in the medical records by the doctor to justify medical necessity for hospitalization on a given day. Keep in mind that up to this point, neither UR nurses nor UM nurses, at both outside organizations and hospitals, had any contact with the patients. In some situations, inhospital UM nurses were responsible for contacting the insurance carrier UM departments each day to report on the specific care being provided to justify each patient's stay for "1 more day." Quality of care was getting more attention; however, concern regarding patient safety was starting to surface. PROs in particular were monitoring care from a quality perspective, raising flags when a complication would occur that was felt to be avoidable. Such instances could result in a team of doctors and nurses coming to the hospital and conducting focused reviews of specific patient populations. The war continued between payers of care and deliverers of care.

Related Articles
Breast Cancer Risks for Those Taking Female Hormones
Lillie D. Shockney, RN, BS, MAS, HON-ONN-CG
October 22, 2021 | AONN+ Blog | Breast Cancer
Female hormones serve as fuel for more than 70% of breast cancers. This is important to consider when meeting patients who may be taking female hormones.
Managing Side Effects versus Preventing Side Effects
Lillie D. Shockney, RN, BS, MAS, HON-ONN-CG
October 20, 2021 | Navigation and Survivorship News | Insights into Navigation
Oncology specialists need to be proactive instead of reactive to side-effects management. Taking certain proactive measures, a specialist can prevent or considerably diminish side effects such as chronic fatigue, nausea, and hair loss.
Mastectomy Surgery for Treatment of Breast Cancer—We’ve Come a Long Way Baby!
Lillie D. Shockney, RN, BS, MAS, HON-ONN-CG
October 18, 2021 | AONN+ Blog | Breast Cancer
Breast cancer treatment has come a long way, offering more options to ensure the patient isn’t forfeiting anything to their cancer.

Thank You to Our Corporate Sponsors and Alliance Partners!

  • Patron Corporate Sponsor

    Patron Corporate Sponsor

  • Patron Corporate Sponsor

    Patron Corporate Sponsor

  • Patron Corporate Sponsor

    Patron Corporate Sponsor

  • Patron Corporate Sponsor

    Patron Corporate Sponsor

  • Patron Corporate Sponsor

    Patron Corporate Sponsor

  • Industry Relations Council Member

    Industry Relations
    Council Member

  • Industry Relations Council Member

    Industry Relations
    Council Member

  • Health System Partner

    Health System Partner

  • Health System Partner

    Health System Partner

  • Health System Partner

    Health System Partner